ACTS 22:1-2 1 "Brethren
and fathers, hear my defense before you now.”
2 And when they heard that
he spoke to them in the Hebrew language, they kept all the more silent. Then
he said:
Who are "they" (Acts 22:2) and who is "he" (Acts 22:2)?
The Apostle Paul has just begun to speak to a massive crowd of Jews in
Jerusalem who tried to kill him until the Roman soldiers intervened. Paul is
atop the stairs leading up to the Antonia Fortress where the Roman garrison
is stationed and "protected" by the Roman soldiers who intervened (see
Acts 21).
Why did the crowd of Jews keep "all the more silent" (Acts
22:2)?
Because
"he spoke to them in the Hebrew language".
(Acts 22:2)
Why would that silence them?
They weren't expecting Paul to be a Jew since the accusation that brought
them together was that he was "against the people" - i.e., Jews:
"... Men of Israel, help! This is the man who teaches
all men everywhere against the people, the law, and this place; and
furthermore he also brought Greeks into the temple and has defiled this holy
place." (Acts
21:28)
ACTS 22:3-5 3
"I am
indeed a Jew, born in Tarsus of Cilicia, but brought up in this city at the
feet of Gamaliel, taught according to the strictness of our fathers’ law,
and was zealous toward God as you all are today.
4 I persecuted this Way to
the death, binding and delivering into prisons both men and women,
5 as also the high priest
bears me witness, and all the council of the elders, from whom I also
received letters to the brethren, and went to Damascus to bring in chains
even those who were there to Jerusalem to be punished.
Where was Paul born and raised?
He was born in
"Tarsus" (Acts 22:3), a city on
the Mediterranean coast in the Roman province of
"Cilicia" (Acts 22:3) in modern southern Turkey, but
"brought up in" (Acts 22:3) Jerusalem. Tarsus was
the intellectual capital of Cilicia and one of the renowned educational
centers in the Roman Empire, surpassed by only Athens and Alexandria.
Who is "Gamaliel" (Acts 22:3)?
Gamaliel was the grandson of Hillel, one of the most important thinkers in
the history of Judaism and the founder of the Hillel school. As the leader
of the Hillel school, Gamaliel was the pre-eminent educator of his
generation and one of the most respected members of the Sanhedrin, the
Jewish ruling council:
"Then one in the council stood up, a Pharisee named Gamaliel,
a teacher of the law held in respect by all the people..." (Acts
5:34)
What did it mean to be "brought up ... at the feet of
Gamaliel" (Acts 22:3)?
It meant that Paul was a chosen pupil of Gamaliel and
"taught according to the strictness of our fathers’ law".
(Acts 22:3)
Why did Paul bring up his educational pedigree?
To have them pay attention to what he was about to say.
Why does Paul say that he was "zealous toward God as you
all are today" (Acts 22:3)?
He understands that their attempt to kill him is driven by their desire to
serve God. He understands well because he once did the same to Christians
for the same reason, going as far as Damascus to persecute them:
"I persecuted this Way to
the death, binding and delivering into prisons both men and women, as also the high priest
bears me witness, and all the council of the elders, from whom I also
received letters to the brethren, and went to Damascus to bring in chains
even those who were there to Jerusalem to be punished."
(Acts 22:4-5)
With whom could they verify Paul's claims?
The high priest and the Sanhedrin, the Jewish ruling council, who vouched
for Paul in writing: "as also the high priest
bears me witness, and all the council of the elders, from whom I also
received letters ... " (Acts 22:5)
ACTS 22:6 6 “Now it happened, as I
journeyed and came near Damascus at about noon, suddenly a great light from
heaven shone around me. 7
And I fell to the ground and heard a voice saying to me, ‘Saul, Saul, why
are you persecuting Me?’ 8
So I answered, ‘Who are You, Lord?’ And He said to me, ‘I am Jesus of
Nazareth, whom you are persecuting.’ 9
“And those who were with me indeed saw the light and were afraid, but they
did not hear the voice of Him who spoke to me.
10 So I said, ‘What shall I
do, Lord?’ And the Lord said to me, ‘Arise and go into Damascus, and there
you will be told all things which are appointed for you to do.’
11 And since I could not
see for the glory of that light, being led by the hand of those who were
with me, I came into Damascus. 12
“Then a certain Ananias, a devout man according to the law, having a good
testimony with all the Jews who dwelt there,
13 came to me; and he stood
and said to me, ‘Brother Saul, receive your sight.’ And at that same hour I
looked up at him. 14
Then he said, ‘The God of our fathers has chosen you that you should know
His will, and see the Just One, and hear the voice of His mouth.
15 For you will be His
witness to all men of what you have seen and heard.
16 And now why are you
waiting? Arise and be baptized, and wash away your sins, calling on the name
of the Lord.’
Is the above true?
Please see for yourself here (Acts 9).
What is Paul describing above?
How he met Jesus. It's Paul's personal testimony.
Isn't personal testimony something personal?
It is, but not confidential.
With whom should personal testimony be shared?
Everyone: "Always be ready to give a defense to
everyone who asks you a reason for the hope that is in you, with meekness
and fear." (1 Peter 3:5) Telling people who Jesus is
and how we met Him is the privilege, duty and joy of every Christian.
How did you meet Him?
...
ACTS 22:17-20 17
“Now it happened, when I returned to Jerusalem and was praying in the
temple, that I was in a trance 18
and saw Him saying to me, ‘Make haste and get out of Jerusalem quickly, for
they will not receive your testimony concerning Me.’
19 So I said, ‘Lord, they
know that in every synagogue I imprisoned and beat those who believe on You.
20 And when the blood of
Your martyr Stephen was shed, I also was standing by consenting to his
death, and guarding the clothes of those who were killing him.’
How will/do those who hear your testimony react?
Not always positively:
"they will not receive your
testimony concerning Me." (Acts 22:19)
How did Paul respond to the Lord's command to leave
"Jerusalem" (Acts 22:17)?
"Lord, they know that in every synagogue I imprisoned
and beat those who believe on You. And when the blood of
Your martyr Stephen was shed, I also was standing by consenting to his
death, and guarding the clothes of those who were killing him."
(Acts 22:19-20)
Why?
He may have been expressing that given how he used to be one of them, he has
credibility with them and they should receive his testimony, or that given
the crimes he committed in Jerusalem in the past, he wanted to make some
amends by his testimony, or both.
Was his response justified?
When God says,
"Make haste and get out of Jerusalem
quickly"
(Acts 22:18), it's best to just make haste and get out of Jerusalem quickly.
God knows what He is doing and where He wants you to go.
ACTS 22:21-26
21 Then He said to me,
‘Depart, for I will send you far from here to the Gentiles.’ ”
22 And they listened to him
until this word, and then they raised their voices and said, “Away with such
a fellow from the earth, for he is not fit to live!”
23 Then, as they cried out
and tore off their clothes and threw dust into the air,
24 the commander ordered
him to be brought into the barracks, and said that he should be examined
under scourging, so that he might know why they shouted so against him.
25 And as they bound him
with thongs, Paul said to the centurion who stood by, “Is it lawful for you
to scourge a man who is a Roman, and uncondemned?”
26 When the centurion heard
that, he went and told the commander, saying, “Take care what you do, for
this man is a Roman."
What did the Jews have against "the Gentiles" (Acts 22:21)?
Jews considered the Gentiles to be unclean heathens and avoided contact with
them unless they were 'God-fearers' (Gentiles who believed in the Jewish Old
Testament) - or 'proselytes' (God fearers who had been circumcised). The
idea that God would send a Jew to Gentiles who were neither God-fearers nor
proselytes was repugnant to them.
How did they express their displeasure?
"They cried out and tore off their clothes
and threw dust into the air" (Acts 22:23) to express
their outrage and called for his death: "Away
with such a fellow from the earth, for he is not fit to live!"
(Acts 22:22)
What is surprising about the timing of their
eruption?
That they waited as long as they did. Paul's account of conversing with
Jesus as "a great light from heaven shone around"
(Acts 22:6) him and calling Stephen a "martyr"
(Acts 22:20) couldn't have been music to the ears of the the angry crowd of
Jews who knew about both Jesus and Stephen and probably included some who
had participated in stoning Stephen and calling for Jesus' death. The timing
of their eruption attests to their lack of repentance toward God and the
depth of their racism toward Gentiles.
What is "scourging" (Acts 22:24)?
The original Greek word is
mastix. The verb form of this word -
mastigoo - was
used in John 19:1, which stated that Jesus was
"scourged"
before His crucifixion, and the
phragelloo, the original Greek verb
translated
"scourged" in
Matthew 27:26 and Mark 15:15 specified this as whipping with the Roman flagellum, whose imbedded metal
and bone pieces ripped out flesh. Paul was about
to have his back ripped open.
Why?
Paul's words had thrown the crowd into a pandemonium and calls for his
death, but since
"he spoke to them in the Hebrew language"
(Acts 21:40), the Roman commander didn't
"know
why they shouted so against him" (Acts 22:24) and
wanted to find out by interrogating him under torture.
Was that legal?
The Roman law allowed it for slaves and people from outside the Roman
Empire, but not for free persons from the Empire and certainly not for Roman
citizens: "And as they bound him
with thongs, Paul said to the centurion who stood by, "Is it lawful for you
to scourge a man who is a Roman, and uncondemned?” When the centurion heard
that, he went and told the commander, saying, “Take care what you do, for
this man is a Roman." (Acts 22:25-26)
ACTS 22:27-29 27
Then the commander came and said to him, “Tell me, are you a Roman?” He
said, “Yes.” 28 The
commander answered, “With a large sum I obtained this citizenship.” And Paul
said, “But I was born a citizen.” 29
Then immediately those who were about to examine him withdrew from him; and
the commander was also afraid after he found out that he was a Roman, and
because he had bound him.
How did a person become a "Roman" (Acts 22:27)?
Roman citizenship was originally reserved for the free residents of the city
of Rome. As the Empire grew, it was granted to even others exceptional
service to the Empire. During the reign of Emperor Claudius (41-54 AD), it
could even be bought, and quite a few Roman government officials money
selling it.
Why did the commander volunteer, "With a large sum I
obtained this citizenship" (Acts 22:28)?
Having been beaten up and almost killed by a mob, Paul most likely didn't
look the part of a respected citizen of Rome. The commander may have guessed
that Paul must have bought his citizenship somehow on the cheap and wanted
to put him in his place.
Why did those who were about to examine Paul "immediately"
(Acts 22:29) withdraw from him?
Being
"born a citizen" (Acts 22:28) of Rome was
more prestigious than buying into it and also meant that Paul was the
relative of other (potentially influential) Romans.
Why was the commander "afraid" (Acts 22:29)?
Paul had been
"bound" (Acts 22:29), which was
also illegal to do to a Roman citizen who hadn't been condemned.
ACTS 22:30 30
The next day, because he wanted to know for certain why he was accused by
the Jews, he released him from his bonds, and commanded the chief priests
and all their council to appear, and brought Paul down and set him before
them.
Where was Paul taken "the next day" (Acts 22:30)?
He was taken from the Roman
"barracks" (Acts
22:24) at the Antonia Fortress
"down" (Acts
22:30) to the temple area just next door.
Who did the commander order to gather?
Sanhedrin, the Jewish ruling council:
"he ... commanded
the chief priests and all their council to appear". (Acts 22:30)
Why?
"Because he wanted to know for certain why he
[Paul]
was accused by the Jews."
(Acts 22:30)